Texas A&M McKinney Says – TPPF Did Not Influence Program With “Seven Breakthrough Solutions”

By VIMAL PATEL

Top Texas A&M System leaders have repeatedly said the idea for a program that gives teachers cash based on anonymous student evaluations did not come from the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a conservative Austin think tank.

“They got it from me,” said Chancellor Mike McKinney, who said in an interview earlier this year that he modeled the program — which has become a symbol of political interference in the university — on a similar one at the University of Oklahoma.

McKinney’s statement regarding the origins of the controversial program is not necessarily untrue, but it doesn’t tell the whole picture.

A similar program to the one at Texas A&M did begin first at the University of Oklahoma. Like at A&M, it gave cash awards of between $2,500 and $10,000 to about 15 percent of the faculty based on anonymous student evaluations.

But the Oklahoma program was pitched by the father of the person who wrote the Texas Public Policy Foundation’s “seven breakthrough solutions” to reforming higher education, one of which was the awards program

Jakie Sandefer, an influential Oklahoma football alum and father of Jeff Sandefer, was on the university’s business school board of advisers. The program ran in the business and engineering schools.

“It’s no secret that he introduced the concept here,” said Robert Dauffenbach, a business professor and associate dean for research and graduate programs at Oklahoma.

Lack of funding at OU

Dauffenbach was in charge of implementing the program, which he said was met with some of the same criticisms it would face at Texas A&M, chiefly the value of student evaluations in gauging how effective a teacher is.

The program — called the Alumni Teaching Award there — lasted around four semesters until it had to be nixed. The culprit was a lack of funding, the university’s president, David Boren, said in a statement released through a university spokesman.

Despite major cuts in the A&M System over the last year that have led to several hundred position reductions at just the flagship College Station campus, the program still remains and since its creation in fall 2008 has given out more than $2.7 million.

When the Oklahoma program began, there was no such thing as the “seven breakthrough solutions” from the Texas Public Policy Foundation that have sparked a statewide clash in Texas over the direction of higher education.

They would be neatly packaged and delivered at an Austin meeting in May 2008 attended by Gov. Rick Perry, a supporter of the ideas, in which Jeff Sandefer had an audience of 45 of the state’s university regents, including all nine from the A&M System board.

So it’s possible that the awards program at Texas A&M University — initially called SLATE, or Student Led Awards for Teaching Excellence — was conceived before the Texas Public Policy Foundation formalized its “solutions.”

Regardless, before A&M, before Oklahoma, the idea came from Jeff Sandefer, a Texas Public Policy Foundation board member.

Worry of outside influence

The exact role the Sandefers played with the program at Oklahoma is not known. The deans of the colleges of business and engineering did not respond to messages and a spokesman for the university, Chris Shilling, did not respond to follow-up questions after confirming that the program did exist.

Jakie Sandefer also did not respond to a message seeking comment.

Texas A&M faculty have worried that private individuals are influencing university policy outside the purview of public scrutiny.

Jeff Sandefer, co-founder of the private Acton School of Business, is a major contributor to Perry, who has publicly supported Sandefer’s ideas.

At Texas A&M University, the Sandefers showed a continued interest in the program.

In the days following an Eagle story in October about possible changes to SLATE, Jeff Sandefer wrote a lengthy email to his dad, articulating several concerns he had with the new program. They included lowering the amount of the award and taking the word “excellence” out of its name. Some faculty have called it an “insult” to say student evaluations alone are a gauge of excellence.

The changes, proposed by Texas A&M Provost Karan Watson, trivialize the award and make it “seem more like a tip,” Jeff Sandefer wrote.

Jakie Sandefer concurred, calling those who would do that “goof balls.” He then emailed his good friend, Phil Adams — a Texas Public Policy Foundation board member and A&M regent — and told him that day to give him a call. A few days later, Jakie Sandefer emailed Watson, the provost, to speak about the program.

It’s unclear who exactly did it, but the program changes were vetoed.

A trail not followed

The program at Oklahoma ended in spring 2009. At that time, the program had been introduced at Texas A&M University and two other universities in the A&M System, and would soon be expanded to all of the system’s 11 universities.

Frank Ashley, vice chancellor of academic affairs for the A&M System, said in 2009 that the system was trailblazing in offering a cash award based solely on student evaluations. Nearly three years later, no top system leader could point to another university that has followed A&M’s path.

It has proven deeply unpopular among faculty at Texas A&M University, with about 3 percent participating last fall in the program. Faculty critics say the program is more a popularity contest than a comprehensive gauge of excellence.

Regent Adams, unaware a microphone was on, said during last week’s regents meeting that the board would get rid of SLATE. Board Chairman Richard Box also said regents would revisit the program.

John Edens, a Texas A&M psychology professor, was one of five original signers of a letter seeking clarity from regents about their plans regarding Sandefer’s ideas. The letter eventually drew more than 800 faculty signatures.

In an interview, Edens lamented external influence on the university: “I wonder how Aggies would feel if they knew major policy decisions are being influenced by a Sooner.”

See story @
http://www.theeagle.com/am/Texas-A-M-s-SLATE-based-on-OU-program

8 comments
  1. Jarvis said:

    I work at A&M as a prof, and I work my tail off making sure students know the material I teach. I don’t let them off easy. They either know it or see it again the next time they take the course. My course evaluations are strong, but I also get lots of comments like “he thinks we actually care about this stuff” or “he made me work too hard.”

    This is a college education their parents are paying for, not just an Aggie ring. With comments like this, I would have very little faith in the SLATE award as a measure of teaching effectiveness.

    Lauren Pierce has been making him/herself a figure on the pro-TPPF side of many forums. Does s/he want to turn Texas into the state with the largest community college campi in the US? Because that’s where the TPPF is taking UT and TAMU.

  2. Lauren Pierce said:

    I SO wish UT had this sort of incentive program going! This might force some of our “warm body” professors into actually caring about their students!

    I don’t know how many times I’ve had an class with an absolutely USELESS professor/lecturer! Does the free market system just drop off when you walk onto a college campus? Because I’m tired of buying a product that isn’t what I want or need. It’s time to make these public employees EARN their paychecks instead of riding on the coattails of a higher education program with a good name.

    Oh and that nonsense about TPPF being the root of this idea is hilarious. This is a system based on incentives, not exactly an earth-shattering idea!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s